
ESPN reporter's stalker captured
This weekend I was on Twitter and reported that the man at the center of the sex tape scandal involving ESPN field reporter Erin Andrews had been arrested by Chicago Police.
I figured at some point the culprit-in-question would slip up and get himself caught, and in no way do I condone what he did but anyone who didn’t want to be revealed would’ve done things a bit more meticulously than this guy.
Michael David Barrett was described by prosecutor Steve Grimes as “obsessive” and “a danger to women”, a Chicago-based federal magistrate ruled that Barrett be released today on bail but kept on home confinement until his October 23 court date which will take place in Los Angeles(because he’s accused of trying to sell the tapes featuring Andrews to paparazzi website TMZ, which is located in Los Angeles).
Of the home confinement ruling, Barrett is allowed to continue reporting to his workplace only but he has to be at home for his 9 p.m.-6 a.m. curfew. He is also banned from internet access while home at all times. Similar videos featuring other women were found on the site used by Barrett, authorities believe seven videos were taken of Andrews while she stayed in the Mariott Hotel at Vanderbilt University back in September 2008.
Barrett made his obsession real, according to an affidavit in July 2008 he called 14 different hotels in Milwaukee and reserved a room at a hotel where Andrews was staying but he didn’t check in. A peephole leading into the door of Andrews’ Milwaukee hotel was altered similar to the one found in September(which was made with a hacksaw used by Barrett). Authorities claim all footage Barrett shot was made with a cellphone.
Creepy doesn’t even begin to describe that story.
I can personally count numerous times(one instance as recent as this past August)where I’ve either been stalked, approached with unwanted advances, or outright attacked by one or more guys. This isn’t about me, but instead it’s about women I admire who(because of their chromosome)are treated differently from their male counterparts in sports media.
It’s 2009 and really nothing has changed in women’s workforce, did those radical feminists of the 60s and 70s fall asleep at the wheel or something? It goes without saying that even with sports journalism, beauty counts for everything. How many homely ESPN anchorwomen or field commentators can you name off the top of your head? But I bet you can run down a list of the most attractive women seen reporting today(and let’s not even get into the fact that there is a horrendous lack of cultural diversity involving females in sports journalism, mainly in front of the camera).
That really shouldn’t be and this is not me making a stand for less-than-attractive women covering sports, this is moreso about the fact that the women who are out every weekend covering games or at the news desk having a round table discussion on the latest BCS Champsionship rankings are vulnerable simply because of who they are:women.
What part of having a vagina makes it okay for you to be so enthralled with me, you want to harm me? It’s already hard enough trying to be seen as equals with the overabundance of males working in sports journalism, now women have to worry about some guy at home getting his jollies watching you report from the field while plotting your death at the same time.
Some could also see extra security for female reporters as a catch 22. On the one hand you want to make sure your employee is safe at all times, but on the other hand most women would take offense to that and go so far as to say “I’m a big girl, I can take care of myself”.
When you have some tall, burly guy sitting outside your office at 11 p.m. with a .357 waiting for you to walk to your car so he can show his admiration for you that “Big Girl” logic goes right out of the window.
Maybe this’ll be a wake up call for companies like the NFL, Fox Sports, and ESPN but if you’re anything like me don’t hold your breath. So until that happens, ladies, I’ll see you on the sidelines.
Source:Chicago Sun-Times
Recent Comments